SPECIAL ISSUE: What Guns Mean: The Symbolic Lives of Firearms
- Sep 19, 2018
- 2 min read
[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]What Guns Mean: The Symbolic Lives of Firearms Editor: Professor Jonathan M Metzl (Frederick B. Rentschler II Professor of Sociology and Medicine, Health, and Society, Director, Center for Medicine, Health, and Society, Professor of Psychiatry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN)
Civilian-owned firearms are particular material objects whose public health implications garner increasing academic and public attention. After years of relative silence, many leading American public health organizations, medical groups, and research universities have now come out against the research blockade put in place by the so-called Dickey Amendment in 1996. Meanwhile, each successive mass shooting highlights the untenable tensions between public demand for expert knowledge to prevent gun death on the one hand, and a government actively engaged in squelching this exact expert knowledge on the other. In response, growing numbers of medical and public health journals publish research articles and special issues that address the health effects of guns and bullets.
To date, however, relatively little attention has been paid to larger questions of what guns mean, and how firearms emerge as powerful symbols whose connotations are shaped by history, politics, and culture. This article collection will explore these latter associations by looking in depth at guns as particular, and particularly charged, cultural and political symbols. Building on this journal’s commitment to foster, wide-ranging interdisciplinary dialogue, this collection aims to bring together work by humanists, social scientists, public health scholars, and other researchers and writers to address the complex meanings of firearms in ways that provide context for current political debates.
Quantitative, qualitative and investigative research from a range of disciplines is welcomed, including, but not restricted to, anthropology, cultural and media studies, history, literary studies, political science, sociology, public health and psychology.
The collection will consider questions and themes such as:
How are guns represented in literature, art, film, or the media, and how do these representations provide deeper understanding of the contested politics of firearms? How does history deepen understandings of racialized, gendered, or socioeconomic associations tied to firearms? How might these histories and associations differ by geographical or global context? How can literary, cultural, or social scientific analysis complement or complicate public health approaches to reducing gun violence? Or deepen understanding of responses to mass shootings, particular gun laws or policies, or the divisive nature of the US corporate gun lobby? In what ways are gun “debates” symbolic of larger tensions or politics? How might literary, cultural, or social scientific approaches provide new modes of addressing the opinions and attitudes that people have about firearms and firearm policies, or provide better understandings of differing points of view? How should the disciplines of the humanities or social sciences or the media effectively engage with political debates about firearm policies? How might these perspectives complicate public-health frameworks surrounding guns? What lessons can global approaches to, or histories of, firearms impart to the United States? What conclusions can be drawn from research from beyond a US perspective? How might the NRA, perceptions of American gun culture, and reports about mass shootings shape global perceptions of the United States? In what ways might addressing firearms symbolically deepen conversations about the ‘sublime qualities’ of guns?[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1529938651989{background-color: #d8d8d8 !important;}”][vc_column][vc_empty_space height=”12px”][vc_column_text]Read What Guns Mean: The Symbolic Lives of Firearms on Palgrave Communication[/vc_column_text][vc_empty_space height=”12px”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_empty_space][/vc_column][/vc_row]




Hollow Knight is known for being a challenging game, but it is not considered the hardest game ever made. Its difficulty comes from demanding combat, precise platforming, and boss battles that require patience and practice. Players are encouraged to learn enemy attack patterns and improve their skills over time. While the main adventure is tough but manageable for most players, optional endgame content offers an even greater challenge. This balance of difficulty and fairness makes Hollow Knight rewarding and satisfying for those who enjoy testing their abilities.
The game often requires attentive movement monitoring in restricted spaces. Players must monitor animatronics in the dark and manage resources. A single mistake might cause a jumpscare, making every moment thrill-packed.Due to its unique blend of horror, strategy, and quick reactions, many gamers love five nights at freddy's.
I started playing Drive Mad during a break and ended up spending way more time on it than expected. The vehicle physics feel unpredictable in a fun way, and some levels really force you to think before accelerating.
Play Run 3 online so fun!
The key is to look ahead Drift Boss, not just at your current position. Planning your next move before reaching a turn allows for smoother drifts and better control.